 |
 |
Hi Heiko, the argus shape parameter for the new data depleted fits are in the last column of the following table: mxlow mxhigh ccb error arg err sig err ar shape 0.00 1.55 246 +- 69 121 +- 11 399 +- 52 -31.160597 1.55 1.90 781 +- 178 309 +- 23 2780 +- 148 -41.748497 1.90 2.20 1313 +- 180 532 +- 27 3095 +- 140 -37.086670 2.20 2.50 537 +- 152 555 +- 22 1225 +- 111 -28.605131 2.50 2.80 384 +- 125 504 +- 18 525 +- 94 -20.323133 2.80 3.10 245 +- 79 478 +- 13 193 +- 56 -10.865112 3.10 3.40 12 +- 21 578 +- 11 280 +- 28 -27.209387 3.40 3.70 89 +- 83 504 +- 16 141 +- 50 -20.677975 3.70 4.20 9 +- 34 554 +- 14 72 +- 31 -30.420233 4.20 5.00 2 +- 22 166 +- 7 11 +- 13 -36.203884 The corresponding table for the old data depleted fit is 0.00 1.55 206 +- 64 103 +- 11 455 +- 46 -22.166891 1.55 1.90 510 +- 129 293 +- 25 3062 +- 100 -37.336121 1.90 2.20 1037 +- 155 434 +- 27 3460 +- 116 -27.915419 2.20 2.50 531 +- 125 506 +- 23 1279 +- 83 -21.427486 2.50 2.80 400 +- 103 457 +- 19 548 +- 64 -16.502308 2.80 3.10 198 +- 89 471 +- 16 242 +- 53 -9.503790 3.10 3.40 118 +- 91 603 +- 25 146 +- 46 -23.234163 3.40 3.70 108 +- 86 484 +- 18 144 +- 46 -18.616257 3.70 4.20 59 +- 44 489 +- 4 88 +- 31 -26.195557 4.20 5.00 14 +- 22 144 +- 3 20 +- 14 -31.754045 The difference in the two tables is that the old one uses ccb and signal parameters from enriched MC sample and lepton cuts, whereas the new one uses ccb and signal parameters from the depleted MC sample and all cuts, and refits the widths of the signal function directly on data if there are more than 1000 events at mES>5.27. Cheers, Concezio.