 |
 |
Concezio Bozzi wrote: > Hi, > I agree we cannot correct SP5 to look like SP6. However, by determining > separate correction factors we definitely get a better data-MC agreement > and get confidence that the fit is working OK. Here are the errors on > the correction factors: > > Entire sample (Run1-4, SP5+6): > > Chi Square of the Fit = 4.48376 This is for the chi^2 fit of the mx plane and not for mes fits? Wolfgang > NDOF = 7 > ratio other/vcb = 0.60 +- 0.07 > Vcb comp = 0.188267 +- 0.00631457 > Oth comp = 0.113042 +- 0.0125698 > > > This is what Kerstin got on separate samples: > >>>> **Fit on Run 1+2, SP5: >>>> chi2/ndof = 1.64116 (for 7 dof) >>>> ratio other/vcb = 0.296045 / 0.287339 = 1.03 +- 0.17 >>>> (with errors: >>>> Vcb comp = 0.287339 +- 0.0183957 >>>> Oth comp = 0.296045 +- 0.0442523) >>>> >>>> **Fit on Run 4, SP6: >>>> chi2/ndof = 1.90748 (for 7 dof) >>>> ratio other/vcb = 0.117799 / 0.141224 = 0.83 +- 0.13 >>>> (with errors: >>>> Vcb comp = 0.141224 +- 0.00785652 >>>> Oth comp = 0.117799 +- 0.0174853)