Hi Bob,
we discussed this issue a bit after the AWG reading. We want to quote
only the number for one Mx cut, which will be 1.55 GeV. We calculated
all systematics for two other cuts, 1.625 and 1.7. The result at 1.55 is
the best in total error. The numbers are in the appendix of our support BAD.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> One question that doesn't appear in the outline: for which cuts on Mx will
> we show results? In particular, how high in Mx do you plan to go? Urs,
> Rolf and Ed went to 2.5 GeV using Run 1-2 only; will you go this high? If
> not, why not? Sorry if this question already has an obvious answer; I
> hvaen't been following this closely.
>
> Bob
>
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Jochen Dingfelder wrote:
>
>> Hi Heiko et al.:
>>
>> Thanks for informing us about your target time schedule.
>> The PAC/DPAC were hoping to send your analysis to DPF,
>> i.e. the analysis would have to go to RC by mid-September.
>> Looking at your schedule this seems unlikely, right?
>> Could you please confirm? We will then let the PAC know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jochen
>>
>>> here is our publication time schedule:
>>>
>>> End of July: Documentation of new strategy of mES fit into BAD
>>> (Antonio & Concezio)
>>> Also D** issue?
>>> August: Parallel work:
>>> * Working on backup solution (Wolfgang)
>>> --> higher purity cut: Old model
>>> * New strategy with higher purity cut (Chukwudi)
>>> CM (Sept.): Presentation of mES fit strategy
>>> Supporting document with fixed mES strategy --> AWG
>>> End of Sep: Analysis to RC (fit strategy approved?)
>>> Beg. of Oct: If yes: Evaluation of systematics
>>> Mid of Oct: Paper draft to RC and then to CWR
>>>
>>> Our attempt to find a new well-controlled mES fit strategy
>>> despite a lot of work has not converged to a stable version
>>> yet. We suspect that we are suffering from the low purity.
>>> As a consequence, we will try to understand if we can find
>>> a stable solution with tighter cuts on purity. In parallel,
>>> Wolfgang will look into the same direction but try to under-
>>> stand if we could simply use in this case our old strategy
>>> as a fall-back solution.
>>>
>>> A status report does not seem possbile before the September
>>> CM due to the August holiday period.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>>
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////
> / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \
> \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria /
> / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \
> \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 /
> /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Menges
Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
+44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
[log in to unmask]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
