 |
 |
Hi Len, I guess the question is whether adding secondary group is truly ATLAS specific or if it's a generally available (if seldom utilized) service during account creation. To the extent it's the latter, the Help Desk doesn't have to know anything special about ATLAS. They are simply executing a normal request. I hope we don't get into the practice of questioning whether a person signing knows what he has signed. Cheers. Charlie -- Charles C. Young M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center P.O. Box 20450 Stanford, CA 94309 [log in to unmask] voice (650) 926 2669 fax (650) 926 2923 CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069 > -----Original Message----- > From: Moss, Leonard J. > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:35 PM > To: Young, Charles C. > Cc: Boeheim, Charles T.; Yang, Wei; atlas-sccs-planning-l; > LeCount, Arla > Subject: RE: First Draft of the Western Tier 2 web page > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 at 13:55 [-0700], Young, Charles C. wrote: > > > This is a much better way of doing it. We will keep the account > > creation process fairly generic, and won't be asking the > Help Desk to > > know anything about ATLAS work space, which is what I > wanted to avoid. > > > > Maybe instead of having the czar add the comment, the ATLAS > specific > > instructions can tell the user to do this? > > Well, I think that's leaning back towards asking the Help > Desk to know something special about Atlas procedures. If a > new user in, say, the GLAST group requested membership in > some GLAST-related secondary group I'm not certain our Help > Desk people would simply assume that the czar had really > noticed that request, and intended to approve it, when he/she > signed the form. That's just my opinion, though. I think > this is another issue we should invite Arla to comment on. >