 |
 |
Are there performance gains for our Western T2 consumers because we may be better connected to them than, say, SWT2? -- Charles C. Young M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center P.O. Box 20450 Stanford, CA 94309 [log in to unmask] voice (650) 926 2669 fax (650) 926 2923 CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069 > -----Original Message----- > From: [log in to unmask] > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Yang, Wei > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:52 PM > To: Stephen J. Gowdy; atlas-sccs-planning-l > Subject: RE: Minutes of ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 6th Sep 2006 > > I asked the question of Atlas release pacman mirror at the > Tier 2/BNL meeting. The respond is that pacman mirror > provides higher availability and is also faster for local > users. Nothing else was mentioned. > > -- > Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [log in to unmask] > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Stephen J. Gowdy > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:46 AM > To: atlas-sccs-planning-l > Subject: Minutes of ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 6th Sep 2006 > > - Pacman mirror at SLAC? > > Could possibly do this. Need to worry a little about it become a > too big a load on the services. Need to find out how much load > this puts on other sites. Not certain why ATLAS needs so many > mirrors as OSG uses one web server for everything. > Using FTP as a > file transfer mechanism would be more efficient but > don't believe > that pacman supports that. Will decide after feedback from the > Tier-2/BNL meeting this morning. > > >