 |
 |
Hi Heiko, should we then interpret the fact that the partial BRBR is stable at larger purity cuts due to the fact that the peaking contribution is smaller? The original fitting model neglects that component, so when that background is larger the fit might not give the right result? Cheers, Francesca PS I read all the presentations and I do not have anything to add to what already said. But in particular I think it is really needed to have a slide on the reweighting in Antonio's presentation. PPS I'll be on a plane this afternoon, so unfortunately I will not able to attend the meeting... On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > Hi, > > I have copied a ppt- and pdf-version of a transparency describing what > Wolfgang has done concerning the fallback solution: > http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~lacker/fallbacksolution.pdf > http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~lacker/fallbacksolution.ppt > > From what I have seen in Wolfgang's directories it looks like that the > chi^2 values are good: > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~menges/Vub/scra/intpur > > Maybe somebody else can also have a look...? > > Cheers, > Heiko > >