Good point(s). On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > Hi, > > since we do not see the second bin being high anymore for an integrated > purity cut >0.4, maybe a linear fit would just work fine here? > Of course cutting on integrated purity will cost us statistics, but maybe > we should get smaller uncertainties from the correction procedure. > > Cheers, > Kerstin > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Chukwudi Kweku Clarke wrote: > >> Hi all, Kerstin noted something of interest in Antonio's talk. Please see >> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/IPartifactVVF.pdf >> Cheers, C.C. >> >