 |
 |
Hi Antonio. I have produced a new dataset like so; ./subVirFit.pl -que xlong -Sun -opt 1 -b -d -FF=1 -rew 12 -wF sysWd/HFAGCombWin06_3d_0.txt -sdDir VVF_BDFHweights_dss1.root -cm CM2 -debug -novarfit -small -tmodel -notunbinmes=3 -countmc -dssRatio 0.551496 -flag test1_corr_BDFHW_dss This is with the old D** ratio and as you can see it uses all the flags. I'm currently using this to create correction factors. C.C. On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi, > > it seems to me that this D** bug was actually due to an inconsitency when > producing the dataset files. > So here is how I proceeded: > > - computed the D**+other ratio performing a 3 parameters mx fit (= > 0.4286+-0.1249). > - produced dataset with this ratio fixed. > - computed the S/P ratio for IP > 0.20 > > now I was running the systematics due to S/P for this IP cut... > > I have a question: do I need to reproduce the D**+other ratio for each IP > cuts (and also datasets for fittest) or can I use the above and just cutting > on IP when computing S/P? > > Antonio > > > Heiko Lacker ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> I have not heard any status report since the beginning of the week. >> It would be good to understand where we stand. >> >> Heiko >> >