 |
 |
Hi Antonio, On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote: > Hi, > > it seems to me that this D** bug was actually due to an inconsitency > when producing the dataset files. > So here is how I proceeded: > > - computed the D**+other ratio performing a 3 parameters mx fit (= > 0.4286+-0.1249). > - produced dataset with this ratio fixed. > - computed the S/P ratio for IP > 0.20 > > now I was running the systematics due to S/P for this IP cut... > > I have a question: do I need to reproduce the D**+other ratio for each > IP cuts (and also datasets for fittest) or can I use the above and just > cutting on IP when computing S/P? In principle, you don't need to do this as this must be independent from the IP cut. If there is time to do it one could of course make a sanity check for another IP cut. Cheers, Heiko > Antonio > > > Heiko Lacker ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > I have not heard any status report since the beginning of the week. > > It would be good to understand where we stand. > > > > Heiko > > >