 |
 |
By the way: I did produce dataset with D** reweighting on Saturday and also computed the S/P correction factors for the no reweighting and for the B/D reweighting scenarios, and what I have found is that the correction factors are exactly the same. Antonio Concezio Bozzi ha scritto: > Yes, if corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt has been obtained on a dataset where > D** have been reweighted to 0.551406. If not, you need to take out > "-dssRatio 0.551496" > Ciao, Concezio. > > CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote: >> Hi Concezio and Antonio, for the stand point of trying to submit jobs >> for the all weighting scenario, is the following th correct way to >> submit my jobs; >> subVirFit.pl -que xlong -opt 1 -b -d -FF=1 -rew 12 -wF >> sysWd/HFAGCombWin06_3d_0.txt -cm CM2 -debug -Sun -novarfit -small >> -tmodel -notunbinmes=3 -fixSBratio corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt -countmc >> -minintpur 0.50 -dssRatio 0.551496 -flag corr_BDFHW_ip050_dss >> for IP cut = 0.5 and using my .txt file, corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt? >> Cheers, C.C. >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Concezio Bozzi wrote: >> >>> The VVF command I used in July to determine the D** fraction to be >>> used in mx unfolded fits is >>> >>> ./subVirFit.pl -que kanga -cm CM2 -debug -novarfit -small -tmodel >>> -notunbinmes=3 -rew 12 -wF sysWd/HFAGCombWin06_3d_0.txt -opt 1 >>> -fitdss 1 -flag fitdss1_nounf_nofixcount -countmc >>> >>> -opt 1 sets the 3-parameter fit, -fitdss 1 is used to set the other >>> component equal to D**lnu decays. >>> >>> Concezio. >>> >