Print

Print


Hi Concezio,

	thanks for the clarification. We figured that out but were not sure 
about what weights applied.

Cheers,

	Wolfgang

Concezio Bozzi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am back, still recovering from thousands of emails and distracted by 
> completely different tasks... no reweighting is applied on fittest, so 
> in order to use any weights you need to dump weighted datasets by using 
> VVF (flag is "-sdDir <directory name>) and read them back with fittest, 
> look at the first lines of fittest::Test. All my tests of last July have 
> been obtained with the dataset used to compute the pstarfactor and using 
> the default reweighting (HFAG average of winter 2006, B and D 
> reweighting, i.e. what you call "ultimate dataset" without the FF 
> reweighting). It would be nice, and it should be also quite easy, to 
> implement the S/B calculation directly on VVF instead of using fittest, 
> however what I have used so far works equally well.
> Ciao, Concezio.
> 
> Wolfgang Menges wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>     we had a meeting on Friday and discussed mainly technical things:
>>
>>  - how to add weights (B, D, FF reweighting) to the fittest script
>>  - to our understanding Antonio's files don't contain any reweighting
>>  - to our understanding Concezio's files may contain weights, he used
>>    VVF to produce RooDataSets but it is unclear what they contain
>>  - Chukwudi will create DataSets with different weight combinations
>>    and compare the number of weighted events with Concezio's Dataset
>>    to figure out what's in
>>  - the ultimate Dataset would include B, D, FF and hybrid reweighting
>>  - Wolfgang is working on the generic reweighting by run period. Code
>>    and numbers are in place and need debugging. Weights are by run
>>    period and charge of B.
>>  - Wolfgang split up the signal MC into run periods 1,2,3 and 4. The
>>    numbers need checking. He will announce the location of the files
>>    later this week.
>>  - Work on back up fit strategy has started.
>>
>> Remarks:
>>
>>  - the FF reweighting might not be optimal as the reweighting function
>>    is linear and not quadratic as required for the latest numbers. Needs
>>    to be checked
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>     Wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>> Chukwudi Kweku Clarke wrote:
>>> Hi all, I got the meeting setup. Hope the time is good for all.
>>> Cheers, C.C.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:07:09 -0700
>>> From: "Hernandez, Donna" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: "Clarke, Chukwudi Kweku" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: RE: Phone meeting
>>>
>>> Hi CC,
>>>
>>> Here is the information and confirmation for  your conference call 
>>> request for tomorrow morning.
>>>
>>> A Meeting Place conference has been scheduled.
>>> Call: 510-665-5437
>>> When: September 01, 2006, 08:00 AM America/Los_Angeles
>>> Meeting ID: 9156
>>>
>>> Donna
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chukwudi Kweku Clarke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 2:42 PM
>>> To: Hernandez, Donna
>>> Subject: RE: Phone meeting
>>>
>>> Hi Donna, could you setup a meeting for me with seven lines for 
>>> tomorrow (Friday September 1st) at 08:00 SLAC time please.
>>> Cheers, C.C.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Hernandez, Donna wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi CC,
>>>>
>>>> That that we got all of that settled here is the information and 
>>>> confirmation for your conference call.
>>>> A Meeting Place conference has been scheduled.
>>>> Call: 510-665-5437
>>>> When: August 30, 2006, 08:30 AM America/Los_Angeles Meeting ID: 2964
>>>>
>>>> Donna
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chukwudi Kweku Clarke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:17 AM
>>>> To: Hernandez, Donna
>>>> Subject: RE: Phone meeting
>>>>
>>>> Okay, then it is three of us.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Hernandez, Donna wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi CC,
>>>>>
>>>>> You need to count all the people calling in for the phone call.
>>>>>
>>>>> Donna
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Chukwudi Kweku Clarke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:11 AM
>>>>> To: Hernandez, Donna
>>>>> Subject: RE: Phone meeting
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be the only one at SLAC so I suppose we only need one line, 
>>>>> right?
>>>>> The meeting will probably be about an hour and a half.
>>>>> Cheers, C.C.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Hernandez, Donna wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi CC,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure I can help you with this, but I need to know how long do you 
>>>>>> need and how many lines?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Donna
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Chukwudi Kweku Clarke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:40 AM
>>>>>> To: Hernandez, Donna
>>>>>> Subject: Phone meeting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Donna, a couple of people from my group and I would like a 
>>>>>> phone meeting set-up for Wednesday (August 30th) at 08:30 SLAC 
>>>>>> time. Would I be possible for you to set this up please?
>>>>>> Cheers, C.C.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Menges
Queen Mary, University of London               SLAC, MS 35
Mile End Road                                  2575 Sand Hill Road
London, E1 4NS, UK                             Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
+44 20 7882 3753                               ++1 650 926 8503
                                                [log in to unmask]
------------------------------------------------------------------------