 |
 |
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_pi0/ Plots. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_nopi0/ On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote: > Hi so look at the spread sheet here; > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_pi0.sxc > > These are almost finished > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins.sxc > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_nopi0.sxc > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> present: Kerstin, Roberto, Heiko >> >> 1) 2-pdf fits performed by Kerstin >> Look reasonably good for fits with all analysis cuts applied >> => We will use this for Unfolding >> >> 2) Charged and Neutral reweightings >> Kerstin suggests to determine it on mEs fits with all analysis cuts >> applied for the unfolding analysis. >> Reminder: mES fits with only lepton cut do not really work with a 2-pdf >> model as we know and the re-weighting numbers for BRBR >> anal¶ysisneed to be determined also on mES fits with only >> lepton cuts. >> >> 3) Roberto will look into mES fits with only lepton cuts when applying >> a purity cut in order to check if the 2-pdf model can also work on >> a sample with a lepton cut only. >> >> 4) As we know now there are bunch of bugs in SP5/SP6 which significantly >> influence the analysis in a negative way. >> >> The deadline for SP5 production was October 31st and the comupting >> management was very reluctant to move for us the deadline. >> The estimate for such a SP5/Sp6 production was O(50 days) which would >> be very difficult for us as we are stuck without a good D** MC fix. >> >> Several people think that the best solution is: Switch to SP8. >> Spending time to do the switch is better than waiting 50 days >> where even not all bugs would have been fixed. >> >> Consequences are: >> 1) We need to repeat everything related to systematics. >> 2) A new analysis release is needed. >> Kerstin suggests to make a real step which opens the possibility >> to run TrackFixUp: 20.2.0d >> >> Kerstin and Roberto are starting working on getting the analysis >> run in the new release. >> >> If I have forgotten something please let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> Heiko >> >> >> >> >