 |
 |
Hi Kerstin, the trend in the PBRBR as a function of IPcut was observed some time ago. At that time I believe we did not even use IPcut-dependent S/P ratios, so this must be due to something else. Of course we should study what's the reason for that but I believe that the impact on the systematic study done by Chukwudi should not be affected. Concezio. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Per conto di Kerstin Tackmann Inviato: giovedì 7 dicembre 2006 23.58 A: CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE Cc: [log in to unmask] Oggetto: Re: B-reco sample Actually, the instability of PBRBR looks more worrysome than that of the errors.. Kerstin On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote: > Hi all so my webpage has the S/P systematics for the complete Breco > sample. The numbers for the "no pi0" sample are wrong. > The numbers can be found using the link at the top of the page. > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/IPsysRelErr.html > Cheers, C.C. >