 |
 |
Received: from exch-anon.win.slac.stanford.edu ([134.79.19.92]) by exch-mail4.win.slac.stanford.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:46:28 -0800 Received: from mailgate02.slac.stanford.edu ([134.79.18.92]) by exch-anon.win.slac.stanford.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:46:28 -0800 Received: from tislnx2.slac.stanford.edu (tislnx2.slac.stanford.edu [134.79.18.65]) by mailgate02.slac.stanford.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1NLkRCU025737; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:46:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from [log in to unmask]) Received: (from apache@localhost) by tislnx2.slac.stanford.edu (8.13.1/8.12.5/Submit-linux) id l1NLkRfa030718; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:46:27 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:46:27 -0800 Subject: RE: [Comment] Website Design for Atlast Tier 2 site [SLAC-TIS #5508] From: "Stephanie Weitzenkamp via RT" <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: [log in to unmask] In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Precedence: bulk X-RT-Loop-Prevention: SLAC-TIS RT-Ticket: SLAC-TIS #5508 Managed-by: RT 3.6.1 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) RT-Originator: [log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] Cc: [log in to unmask] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Return-Path: [log in to unmask] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2007 21:46:28.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[12B18A70:01C75794] Chip, Good summary. Here is some email concern from B. Cowles: I will be very interested in how this is done. I will also be quite unhappy if it turns out to be an afterthought rather than an initial consideration in terms of the chosen solution. Gordy's response: Any suggestions or guidelines to follow? Was this an offer to help guide the group in their selection process? I think the initial design is simple and static web pages. Let' not overcomplicate. Can't really keep sharepoint in mind AND keep to this "simple" design. Please set up a meeting for mid march for us to site down and go threw concept ideas. Do we want to use twiki? Wikipedia? Whatever the solution, this needs to be a quick fix as we don't have a lot of resources to apply to this. Stephanie -----Original Message----- From: Chip Dalby via RT [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 11:06 AM Subject: [Comment] Website Design for Atlast Tier 2 site [SLAC-TIS #5508] This is a comment by 'cdalby'. It is not sent to the Requestor(s). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Met with Atlas Tier 2 to collect requirements. Participants: Leonard Moss Wei Yang Ruth McDunn Stephanie Weitzenkamp Chip Dalby Michael Gordon The "Objective" is to simply design the current site to make it visually more appealing and to optimize the functionality of the site. The "Requirements" - Make the site similar to other Tier 2 sites - Do not overly brand "SLAC" - this site won't be put in a SLAC template for political reasons - It is preferable to keep the site hosted on a UNIX server for maintenance reasons. - Design with knowledge that site may be moved to sharepoint in the future - Would be ideal, but not critical, to have a message board/posting capability The "Action" We will research Tier 2 sites to understand the subject matter better so we can look to the current content to see if it is optimized and architected optimally. No actual design work will take place before march 8 - that has been made clear to the customer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ticket: https://www-tisint.slac.stanford.edu/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=5508 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------