 |
 |
Most of the time, ATLAS use around 150 slots. This is a very rough estimation. I have seen something like 270 slots for a few hours (http://wt2.slac.stanford.edu/images/1monthJobSnapshot.png). I would be eager to try 400 slots. I think another question is that once ATLAS batch machines are up and running, do we want them to be in general queues? I guess Randy will certain want to see that happen:-) If yes, how do we calculate the ATLAS shares? Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O) Randy Melen - SLAC/SCS wrote: > Stephen, I don't think those numbers are right. Of course this is 2 days later than your email so > ... > > Anyway, right now when I look, I see the following: > > If I consider all Linux jobs and job slots, **including systems in dedicated BaBar queues**, I see > this: > > there are 3743 jobs running in 4930 possible job slots, about 78% full > > But if I look only at the job slots available for general queue jobs, then I see > > there are 525 jobs running in 538 possible job slots, about 98% full > > Anything over about 95% full is "goodness" since job termination and rescheduling etc. > probably takes a few percent. > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:35:07 +0100 (CET) "Stephen J. Gowdy" wrote: > >> Hi All, >> I see there are very few busy CPUs (around 691 out of 5918) just >> now at SLAC. Can we increase the number used for ATLAS production? I guess >> I'm not sure how the single NFS server will deal with a higher load. Wei, >> do you have an idea of how far it can be pushed? >> >> regards, >> >> Stephen. >> >> -- >> /------------------------------------+-------------------------\ >> |Stephen J. Gowdy, SLAC | CERN Office: 32-2-A22| >> |http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | CH-1211 Geneva 23 | >> |http://calendar.yahoo.com/gowdy | Switzerland | >> |EMail: [log in to unmask] | Tel: +41 22 767 5840 | >> \------------------------------------+-------------------------/