 |
 |
I think certifications should only depend on getting the right results and not requiring any additional burdens on the software developers. Within those constraints, individual Tier 2 sites ought to have the freedom to trade off per box performance and memory footprint against other considerations as long as they meet their obligations to Atlas for total capacity. On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 at 10:19 [-0700], Wei Yang wrote: > I don't know what does 'certified' mean. My original question was to > make sure RHEL4 64bit is the right one to use. And I think we still have > this issue of RHEL vs SLC. I will e-mail Fred and David to get more info. > > Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O) > > > Young, Charles C. wrote: > > I wonder what it means to certify. Results are the same? Results are the > > same _and_ CPU performance is no worse? Results are the same, CPU > > performance is no worse and memory requirements are similar? Anyone > > know? > > > > -- > > Charles C. Young > > M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center > > P.O. Box 20450 > > Stanford, CA 94309 > > [log in to unmask] > > voice (650) 926 2669 > > fax (650) 926 2923 > > CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069 >