Print

Print


Hi Francesca, 
I have gone through all the reweighting stuff together with Antonio and we
finally agree that what you produced is what we need. The mb and a values we
were using so far are leftovers from the validation process. 
Thanks, ciao, Concezio. 

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Francesca Di Lodovico [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Inviato: luned́ 11 giugno 2007 20.40
> A: Concezio Bozzi
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Oggetto: Re: R: new weights
> 
> Ciao Concezio, the motivation for those choices for the BFs can be found
> on the last table in:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~lodovico/protected/vub/weights/hybrid.html
> with respect to which only the pi/pi0lnu BFs have been updated to the
> PDG07 (HFAG averages).
> The central values for mb and a comes from hep-ex/0507253 (Oliver's and
> Henning's paper), see the first line below the first table.
> I will update the web page with the new weights once ready.
> 
> I thought this was the decision we reached at the meeting last week, if
> not, could you please let me know what should I change?
> Thanks,
>  		Francesca
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> |  Francesca Di Lodovico              Queen Mary, University of London |
> |  E-mail:[log in to unmask]  Physics Department               |
> |  Phone:  +44-(0)20-7882-5035        Mile End Road                    |
> |  Fax:    +44-(0)20-8981-9465        London E1 4NS, UK                |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Concezio Bozzi wrote:
> 
> > Hi Francesca,
> > thanks. There are also some (minor) differences in the exclusive BF with
> > respect to what we were using so far, e.g. the rho BFs. I guess this is
> > because the numbers were taken directly from the SP8 generation values.
> >
> > We took from SP8 also the values for the inclusive BFs - 0.001892 for
> > B+->Xulnu, 0.001948 for B0->Xulnu - which you updated to 0.002304 and
> > 0.002220 respectively.
> >
> > Another difference regards m_b (4.62 -> 4.6586) and a(2.27 -> 1.32669).
> > Could you clarify this?
> >
> > Thanks, ciao, Concezio.
> >
> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
> >> Da: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-vub-
> >> [log in to unmask]] Per conto di Francesca Di Lodovico
> >> Inviato: luned́ 11 giugno 2007 10.17
> >> A: [log in to unmask]
> >> Oggetto: new weights
> >>
> >> Hi, the file with the new weights (for the main configuration) can be
> >> found in:
> >>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/%7Elodovico/protected/vub/weights/weightsB/ne
> >> w_weightfile_ellipse1_w1_exp_B.txt
> >>
> >> The only difference with respect to before is in the pi(0)lnu final
> >> state. The BF's correspond to the PDG 07 value (ie based on all the
> >> published measurements). The other BF's are the same then before, as
> there
> >> isn't any new published measurement since then.
> >>
> >> During this week, I will produce the weight files also for the
> >> configurations related to the systematics.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>  		Francesca
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> |  Francesca Di Lodovico              Queen Mary, University of London
> |
> >> |  E-mail:[log in to unmask]  Physics Department
> |
> >> |  Phone:  +44-(0)20-7882-5035        Mile End Road
> |
> >> |  Fax:    +44-(0)20-8981-9465        London E1 4NS, UK
> |
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >