 |
 |
Ciao Concezio, the errors are on the web page: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~lodovico/protected/vub/weights/hybrid.html (see bottom table), except for the pi(0), where the error is from PDG2007 (HFAG update): pilnu 1.36 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.07 pi0lnu 0.77 +/- 0.10 +/- 0.07 Cheers, Francesca ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London | | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department | | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road | | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Bozzi, Concezio wrote: > Hi Francesca, > which are the errors on the exclusive BFs you are using? > Thanks, Concezio. > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Francesca Di Lodovico [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Inviato: lun 11/06/2007 11.39 > A: Bozzi, Concezio > Cc: vub-recoil > Oggetto: Re: R: new weights > > Ciao Concezio, the motivation for those choices for the BFs can be found > on the last table in: > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~lodovico/protected/vub/weights/hybrid.html > with respect to which only the pi/pi0lnu BFs have been updated to the > PDG07 (HFAG averages). > The central values for mb and a comes from hep-ex/0507253 (Oliver's and > Henning's paper), see the first line below the first table. > I will update the web page with the new weights once ready. > > I thought this was the decision we reached at the meeting last week, if > not, could you please let me know what should I change? > Thanks, > Francesca > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London | > | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department | > | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road | > | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK | > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Concezio Bozzi wrote: > >> Hi Francesca, >> thanks. There are also some (minor) differences in the exclusive BF with >> respect to what we were using so far, e.g. the rho BFs. I guess this is >> because the numbers were taken directly from the SP8 generation values. >> >> We took from SP8 also the values for the inclusive BFs - 0.001892 for >> B+->Xulnu, 0.001948 for B0->Xulnu - which you updated to 0.002304 and >> 0.002220 respectively. >> >> Another difference regards m_b (4.62 -> 4.6586) and a(2.27 -> 1.32669). >> Could you clarify this? >> >> Thanks, ciao, Concezio. >> >>> -----Messaggio originale----- >>> Da: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-vub- >>> [log in to unmask]] Per conto di Francesca Di Lodovico >>> Inviato: luned́ 11 giugno 2007 10.17 >>> A: [log in to unmask] >>> Oggetto: new weights >>> >>> Hi, the file with the new weights (for the main configuration) can be >>> found in: >>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/%7Elodovico/protected/vub/weights/weightsB/ne >>> w_weightfile_ellipse1_w1_exp_B.txt >>> >>> The only difference with respect to before is in the pi(0)lnu final >>> state. The BF's correspond to the PDG 07 value (ie based on all the >>> published measurements). The other BF's are the same then before, as there >>> isn't any new published measurement since then. >>> >>> During this week, I will produce the weight files also for the >>> configurations related to the systematics. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Francesca >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London | >>> | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department | >>> | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road | >>> | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK | >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> >> >> >> > > >