Print

Print


Hi Gordon,

I completely agree with that 1-job 1-core is not going to work for long. Memory cost is dominating. We ride a slower Moore's law. We need to uitlize multiple cores per job, like one single faster CPU. I have been pushing ATLAS but there is not much action. Processing several clusters or tracks in parallel can be problematic -- they may have overlapping hits. Processing events in parallel shuld be physics safe. I have also pushed G4 (core) without success. Cheers.

					Charlie
--
Charles C. Young
M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center       
P.O. Box 20450                                         
Stanford, CA 94309                                      
[log in to unmask]                                
voice  (650) 926 2669                         
fax    (650) 926 2923                       
CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Gordon Watts
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:15 AM
> To: atlas-sccs-planning-l
> Subject: RE: Agenda for ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 25th July 2007
> 
> Hi,
>   As usual, I'm not at all sure that I can make this meeting 
> (it overlaps with one of the physics meetings I regularly 
> attend). But, I thought I'd add my two cents worth.
> 
>   SLAC may already have a great deal of experience at this -- 
> but we found that testing modern dual-head 4 core (i.e. total 
> 8 core) machines took longer than normal. We had to tweak 
> some Linux OS parameters in order to really get the machine 
> to run properly. A caveat in this is that we are using this 
> as a DAQ machine and so we use shared memory to move data 
> round, and most of what we did had to do with that. But, 
> none-the-less, I would allow for a longer-than-expected 
> testing time if SLAC hasn't already had some experience with 
> these 8 core CPUs.
> 
>   I don't know about you guys -- but it is seems to me that 
> at the rate we are adding cores to pizza boxes our usage 
> model is going to break down (i.e. one core, one job). It 
> seems at the straining point right now.
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 		Gordon.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner- 
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen J. Gowdy
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:50 PM
> > To: ATLAS SCCS Planning
> > Subject: Agenda for ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 25th July 2007
> > 
> > ATLAS SCCS Planning 25Jul2007
> > -----------------------------
> > 
> >   9am, SCCS Conf Rm A, to call in +1 510 665 5437, press 1, 3935#
> > 
> > Present:
> > 
> > Agenda:
> > 
> > 1. DQ2 Status/Web Proxy
> > 
> > 2. Tier-2 Hardware
> > 
> > 3. AOB
> > 
> > Action Items:
> > -------------
> > 
> > 070711	Stephen	Find out about benchmarks for CPUs for next
> > purchase
> >  	070718 Not done yet.
> 
>