 |
 |
Hi Ray: Here is a few from me. I only got to the bottom of page 5. Abstract: "Here ccbar indicates" get rid of here. Main boday: 34) "easiest"? not good English. 42) I am not sure how the cancelation works and where the 17% comes from. 65) signal sideband is jargon. 76) having -> with, and I think you probably do not need these much details on the number of hits and angle. 88) Again, I think you do not have to list the angle. 93) These candidates are subsequently assigned a nominal pi0 mass... 100) just curious: how big is the sigma here for hte decay-length? in terms of centimeters? Minliang On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Ray F. Cowan wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Just a reminder--we were assigned BAD 1808, version 11 to review (due Feb 24, > yesterday). If you can send me your comments today, I will combine and post > them tonight. > > Thanks, > --Ray > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:43:48 -0800 (PST) > From: Ray F. Cowan <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: BAD 1808, v22 institutional review, due Feb 24 > > Hi Everyone, > > We seem to have missed an institutional review assignment for MIT: > BAD 1808, version 11, comments due on Feb 24 (Sunday). > > I apologize for the short notice. I wonder if you could take a look at > version 11 at > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/babar-internal/BAD/doc/detail.html?docNum=1808 > > and send me comments by midnight Eastern time, Sunday, Feb 24? Then I'll > combine and post them as usual. > > Thanks, > --Ray > > >