Print

Print


Hi Wei, 

Thanks! The October numbers are sent out in late November :-( I was wondering if there is either a "last 30 days", "this month to date" or similar variants of this report so we have more up to date information. Cheers. 

							Charlie
--
Charles C. Young
M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center       
P.O. Box 20450                                         
Stanford, CA 94309                                      
[log in to unmask]                                
voice  (650) 926 2669                         
fax    (650) 926 2923                       
CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Wei Yang
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 4:57 PM
> To: atlas-sccs-planning-l
> Subject: FW: October 2008 - Tier-2 Reliability and Availability Report
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Lcg Office <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:48:27 +0100
> To: "project-wlcg-cb (Members of the WLCG CB)" 
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: "project-lcg-gdb (LCG - Grid Deployment Board)"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: October 2008 - Tier-2 Reliability and Availability Report
> 
> Dear Collaboration Board Members,
> 
> Please find below the draft WLCG Reliability and Availability 
> Report for the
> Tier-2 sites for last month.
> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewfile/LCG/SamMbReports?file
> name=Tier2_Rel
> iab_200810.pdf
>  
> Send your comments and corrections to [log in to unmask] 
> before Thursday 27 November 2008. The report will then be 
> published on the WLCG planning page and reported to the WLCG 
> Overview Board.
>  
> Best regards.
> Alberto Aimar, LCG Office
>  
> Unofficially (for now) we also have the "weighted average of 
> the sites in a federation based on cpucount at the site".
> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewfile/LCG/SamMbReports?file
> name=Tier2_Rel
> iab_200810_weighted.pdf
>  
> This was requested by several federations and in the future 
> we will make this the official report (starting next month). 
> When the cpucount information is missing, the average for 
> that federation is not "weighted"
> (as in the current report). Please send me feedback and check 
> the cpucount values used on this new report..
>  
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> 
>