 |
 |
Hi Kerstin, I recently went through the numbers and also made averages for eta l nu and others. The BF all assume isospin holds, so they have been modified from the HG_FAG averages. The D** BF still reflect the set that had 1.4% non-resonant decays, the newest ones without non-resonant decays are in the presentation I mailed you, I hope that this helps, Vera ============================================ Vera Luth SLAC - Stanford University 2575 Sandhill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Phone: 650 926 2702 FAX 650 926 2657 ============================================ -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kerstin Tackmann Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:32 PM To: vub-recoil Subject: B->Xulnu BFs Dear vub-recoilers, if I remember correctly, you more-or-less recently updated the weights for the B->Xulnu BFs, but the new files do not seem to have made it into cvs yet. I am doing the same on my side by going to the HFAG averages for the pi, rho, omega and eta' modes, but I am not sure what to use for eta (where there are several measurements, but no average from HFAG) and for the inclusive BF (I cannot find anything on the HFAG page). Also, what did you pick for mb and a? B->Xclnu only? B->Xsgamma only? The combination? I can basically come up with reasonable justifications for either of the choices and am wondering what you decided for. Thanks much, Kerstin