Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the information. Can I use meta manager instead of supervisor?
Below is my cfg. If I use atlas-bkp2 to read a file which is in
c170~c199, xrootd will try to stage in this file. But I don't want it
to stage in this file, I want it to read the file from c170~c199. What
do I need to update?
http://wisconsin.cern.ch/~wguan/xrdcluster.cfg
http://wisconsin.cern.ch/~wguan/xrdclusterd
Thanks
Wen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> I'm not sure I completely understand the question. It is always possible to
> have more than 64 servers as long as you have the supervisors to support
> them. Any or all of those servers can be designated as staging servers. So,
> the answer is yes assuming you are asking the question I think you are.
>
> Andy
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "wen guan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 7:25 AM
> Subject: Is it possible to use more than 64 servers in xrootd staging pool
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested to setup a xrootd staging pool using more 64 machines. It
>> seems xrootd tries to staging the file from backend pool if the file
>> is in supervisor. Is it possible to use more than 64 servers in xrootd
>> staging pool?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen
>>
>
>
