Hi Andreas,
Quite correct. I'll fix it when I get back from the OSG meeting. Or, I'll
try to fix it during the meeting. Either way, it will get fixed.
Andy
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Andreas-Joachim Peters wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> to set it to zero is not a solution because you don't want to loose the
> static client ID. I think it should be once set and never touched again.
>
> Cheers Andreas.
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky
> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Thanks for pointing that out. Another solution is to set statisID to zero
>> to avoid the double-free. Hmmm, never got into a situation of a double
>> hand-shake.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Andreas-Joachim Peters wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I get SEGVs using XrdSecsss with the origin in the Deletion function:
>>>
>>>
>>> char *XrdSecProtocolsss::staticID = 0;
>>>
>>> void XrdSecProtocolsss::Delete() {
>>> ....
>>> if (staticID) free(staticID);
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> My understanding of the problem is the following:
>>> the staticID (for the client) is once set in the protocol initialization
>>> function, then it get's deleted after the first sss handshake.
>>>
>>> Whenever there is a second hanshake within the same application it SEGVs
>>> in
>>> the Delete function.
>>> So, I would just remove the free of the static member ?!?!?
>>>
>>> Cheers Andreas.
>>>
>>>
>
