 |
 |
Hi Paul, The binding is determined by the routing. That is, xrootd doesn't bind to any particular interface. The connection it receives will bind that connection to whatever interface the connectioon used. In essence, both connections are available, the one that is used is determined by the client. Andy On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Paul T. Keener wrote: > Andy, > > Thanks, that is helpful. > > >> If you want to leave it open-ended and can't use an LVM, then yes, you >> would need two xrootd's. > > The problem with LVM is that they typically do not allow you to remove disks > from volumes. Very Large monolithic filesystems also scare me (zfs not > withstanding...) > > > One more question: Can I force xrootd to bind to a particular network > interface? I know I can specify the port, but I want to specify > 192.168.1.10:1094 (ie, private eth1) rather than 128.91.45.10:1094 (ie, > public eth0). > > Thanks. > > -paul >