 |
 |
Hi Lukasz, ok, let's have a chat with Steve about this and then reestablish the contact to Mattias. Fixing bugs and not getting the fixed version out somewhat limiting. Cheers, Dirk On 02.11.2011, at 18:47, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Steve Traylen is the responsible for lxplus installations and he > prefers taking the packages from EPEL. He has very good reasons for > that: the ROOT version from EPEL is built against the xrootd version > from EPEL and taking xrootd from different source caused problems in > the past. I cannot forward you the exchange with Mattias because there > was none. He has never responded to any of my emails. > > Cheers, > Lukasz > > 2011/11/2 Dirk Duellmann <[log in to unmask]>: >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> that sounds odd. Who decides on lxplus deployment if not us? If epel is now on the critical path for lxplus - when did that happen? please also forward me you last exchange with mattias. >> >> Cheers, Dirk >> >> >> On 02.11.2011, at 18:32, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #83628 (project xrootd): >>> >>> This is actually a whole another story. The version on lxplus is picked up >>> from EPEL (for various reasons) and Mattias is not responding to my emails. >>> >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> >>> Reply to this item at: >>> >>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?83628> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah >>> http://savannah.cern.ch/ >>> >>