 |
 |
Actually, I agree with Steve. The proper way to proceed is merge our packaging and the one of EPEL. The problem is that Mattias (the EPEL responsible for xrootd) is not responding to emails at all :/ Lukasz 2011/11/2 Dirk Duellmann <[log in to unmask]>: > Hi Lukasz, > > ok, let's have a chat with Steve about this and then reestablish the contact to Mattias. Fixing bugs and not getting the fixed version out somewhat limiting. > > Cheers, Dirk > > > On 02.11.2011, at 18:47, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Dirk, >> >> Steve Traylen is the responsible for lxplus installations and he >> prefers taking the packages from EPEL. He has very good reasons for >> that: the ROOT version from EPEL is built against the xrootd version >> from EPEL and taking xrootd from different source caused problems in >> the past. I cannot forward you the exchange with Mattias because there >> was none. He has never responded to any of my emails. >> >> Cheers, >> Lukasz >> >> 2011/11/2 Dirk Duellmann <[log in to unmask]>: >>> Hi Lukasz, >>> >>> that sounds odd. Who decides on lxplus deployment if not us? If epel is now on the critical path for lxplus - when did that happen? please also forward me you last exchange with mattias. >>> >>> Cheers, Dirk >>> >>> >>> On 02.11.2011, at 18:32, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #83628 (project xrootd): >>>> >>>> This is actually a whole another story. The version on lxplus is picked up >>>> from EPEL (for various reasons) and Mattias is not responding to my emails. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________ >>>> >>>> Reply to this item at: >>>> >>>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?83628> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah >>>> http://savannah.cern.ch/ >>>> >>> >