Hi Matevz,
Actually, this is no different from transfer/purge records in that respect,
as order doesn't really matter within that interval; only the server start
time does (i.e., all the records are identical with the same start time). I
suppose I could, but I don't see how that would materially change stuff as
you would have to handle this one differently. Let me know if you really
think this is an issue once you've determined what has to change on your
part.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Matevz Tadel
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Andrew Hanushevsky ; Matevz Tadel ; [log in to unmask]
Subject: [sr #124729] Monitoring of server restart
Follow-up Comment #10, sr #124729 (project xrootd):
Thanks Andy, I see it now :)
All the '=' messages have seq-id=0. I realize this is somewhat irrelevant
...
but one needs to keep track of those guys at some level so I thought I'd ask
... is this intentional? This means I have to treat those messages somewhat
differently (branch off early on and ignore seq-id).
Cheers,
Matevz
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.cern.ch/support/?124729>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
http://savannah.cern.ch/
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
