Follow-up Comment #3, bug #93069 (project xrootd):
Hi Andy,
I don't mind breakages *if* they also break the ABI (I do mind when I notice
breaks from user reports of random corruption).
I think we've discussed this before on xrootd-devel - if this can be done by
some clean mechanism which is compatible with RPM's dependency resolution,
I'm content. This one in particular has been on our list for awhile, and
it's likely fairly easy to implement once the interface is exposed.
I would claim I see little difference between "ossv" and "oss version 2",
especially if the server is backward compatible with "oss version 1". I
suppose if I were to channel Matias, he would be more interested in backward
compatibility than I would.
Brian
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?93069>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
http://savannah.cern.ch/
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
