 |
 |
Wei, Thanks. I was trying to use it to solve problems I was having with apparent timeouts opening files when the data server was very busy as well as improve dreadful latency problems getting directory listings on xrootdfs. If CNS isn't the way to improve the situation for these problems, what is? Is SSI obviated as well? Thanks again. -paul On 07/03/2012 02:29 PM, Yang, Wei wrote: > I guess the answer is yes. it is still supported though we don't have a use case right now. > > regards, > Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O) > > > On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Paul T. Keener wrote: > >> Is CNS still supported? >> >> I have tried to find information on getting it set up correctly, but the >> existing documentation is incomplete and I have received no response to >> my questions. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Paul T. Keener >> Department of Physics and Astronomy >> University of Pennsylvania >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1