Follow-up Comment #4, bug #93993 (project xrootd):
Hi Brian,
Ah, but the proposal had an "or" in it and you said yes. So, do we fix it by
adding readv to read to remain backward compatible *or* assume that since we
never added it before we can keep it separate anyway for a cleaner
implementation (i.e. claim the error was that we actually never reported it)?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?93993>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
http://savannah.cern.ch/
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
