 |
 |
On 09/26/2012 07:03 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: > Hi Victor, > > The particular fix came in two parts: > > 1) The fix to XrdPosix to recognize errors during reads when then > returned value from read is zero. That is what you tested. > > 2) A fix to the server to pass through the proper error code instead > of dumpng into the generic error = 38 class. You would need an upadted > server to see the real error number. That will have to wait for the > next release. > > At least you are not misled into thinking the operation succeeded > when, in fact, it did not. > > Andy Andy, thank you very much for explanations. Victor > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Victor Kotlyar wrote: > >> >> Follow-up Comment #2, bug #97560 (project xrootd): >> >> thank you very much! >> after fix we have -1 for rc now that is good. >> >> *errno* still is not very useful >> >> error read: Function not implemented(38) >> read rc = -1 errno 38 >> >> >> >> But at least CASTOR sees it as error >> >> Sep 24 15:30:09 rtcpd[11328,1]: DiskToMemory() read(): errno = 38, >> serrno = >> 0, rfio_errno = 0 >> Sep 24 15:30:09 rtcpd[11328,1]: rtcpd_AppendClientMsg() called >> Sep 24 15:30:09 rtcpd[11328,1]: rtcpd_AppendClientMsg() txtbuf= >> CPDSKTP ! >> ERROR READING DISK FILE: No such file or directory >> >> >> Regards, >> Victor >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Reply to this item at: >> >> <http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?97560> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah >> http://savannah.cern.ch/ >> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1