 |
 |
Hello Tim, I believe I have all the information I need from Marco to implement the silicon sensor supports more accurately. Perhaps we can discuss this in Arlington. Norman -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nelson, Timothy Knight Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:21 PM To: Hansson Adrian, Per Ola Cc: Maurik Holtrop; hps-software Subject: Re: Meeting notes. Ok, sure. I wouldn't say it is trivial, but easier than a more accurate model of carbon fiber coverage. The latter, however, has a real impact on physics. So, I would vote for that first if it's on the table. Tim Sent from my iPhone On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:10 PM, "Hansson Adrian, Per Ola" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > we agree with that. But as it was a trivial additional change when updating to a new geometry we decided that we can put these in to prove that point. If it would slow down any other work it's not a priority. At least that's what I took from the discussion during the meeting. > > /Pelle > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Nelson, Timothy Knight wrote: > >>> 3) The sensor description could be improved some, adding the hybrid and the cooling block. >> >> Can someone outline this for me? The hybrid and cooling block have zero impact on backgrounds as far as I understand. >> >> Tim >> >> On Oct 18, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Maurik Holtrop wrote: >> >>> Hello HPS-Software, >>> >>> Just some quick meeting notes on today's software meeting. >>> >>> Geomtery: >>> >>> We need to make some updates on the geometry of the detector to make sure we can believe the background rates and to be convincing to our reviewers: >>> 1) Tracker needs to go to 6 layers, with double layers according to the final version. (Matt will look into this). >>> 2) We should put in the vacuum box around the tracker. A model for this exists in Gemc, which can be exported to GDML. (Maurik will create the GDML.) >>> 3) The sensor description could be improved some, adding the hybrid and the cooling block. >>> 4) ECAL should reflect the latest and greatest version. >>> 5) The tesselated ECAL vacuum box needs to be replaced with the Geant4 primitives version. The GDML for this exists. (Matt will ask Norman on the status of this.) >>> >>> >>> Tracking: >>> >>> Pelle updated us on the discussions in yesterday's tracking meeting. We can now create "fake" tracks that allow us to test the tracking algorithms. Final step will be to add this in the form of actual tracker hits, so that the upstream part of the code can also be tested. >>> >>> Alignment: >>> >>> Pelle will give an update on the status of the alignment code next week. >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Maurik >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >> > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1