Hi Andy, On 10/01/12 14:19, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: > Hi Matevz, > > -----Original Message----- From: Matevz Tadel > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 12:38 PM > > I'm finally going to implement this at UCSD. >>> What's the "this"? > > Brian sort of mentioned that this > might be possible by just running two cmsd-s at the redirector ... one for > haddop/shared space and another one for the nfs space. Is this really possible? >>>> Absolutely, this is done all the time when you try to merge incompatible >>>> options. > > So, I'd need to use xrootd.export, oss.export in the original xrootd config and > use cms.export (or all.export) for the additional cmsd. Looking at the code, > "oss" does not seem to take "oss.export" version, only "all.export" ... is this > even relevant on the redirector? That is, is just "xrootd.export" sufficient? >>>> There is only all.export. though I must admit, the config file does allow >>>> you to break that up by compoenent (i.e. cms, oss). We really don't support >>>> that and probably should close that loophole because it makes the config >>>> file almost impossible to decipher. The export does matter to the redirector >>>> as these identify the paths to be exported to its meta-manager. OK, thanks. So, with all.export only, I can have the same xrootd.cfg for all xrootds/cmsds but I need a special cmsd-hdfs.cfg and cmsd-nfs.cfg on the redirector for the two cmsd instances (I do not see a way to tell them apart with the 'if' syntax of config files). I assume I have to use the same name for (xroot, cmsd, cmsd) triplet. Matevz > Alternatively, I will run another xrootd/cmsd pair (on another port) with a > static prefix-based redirect from the original redirector. >>>> That would certainly be the simplest way to do it. > > Andy ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1