 |
 |
HPS-Proposal2014-v3 exists and should be used for the proposal. Described on Confluence, see below. https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Working+with+detector+geometry I've moved many of the recent (made in the last couple of months) geometries into a sandbox, so LCIO files that rely on those detectors will no longer run unless you manually copy the geometries back into hps-detectors/detectors. This is intentional and meant to kick people off of those (bogus) detectors; we're not going to do this every time we make a new detector. On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Sho Uemura wrote: > Yes. That's the right way to do it. > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Maruyama, Takashi wrote: > >> Sho, >> To maintain the chicane configuration, the PS magnetic field strength will >> be 0.25 Tesla at 1.1 GeV, 0.5 Tesla at 2.2 GeV, and 1.5 Tesla at 6.6 GeV. >> Is the field set correctly in the new detector geometry? A foolproof way >> might be prepare three detectors like "HPSDetector_for_1.1GeV" using >> correct field map. >> Takashi >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >> > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1