Chris,
you were running the fix committed to the development branch. It has
now been back-ported to stable and will likely be released as a 3.2.6
this evening. Just to double-check, would it be possible for you to
verify if the following works for you?
https://teamcity-dss.cern.ch:8443/viewLog.html?buildId=22019&buildTypeId=bt46&tab=artifacts
Cheers,
Lukasz
On 11/03/2012 04:14 PM, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
> On 03/11/12 14:15, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
>> On 02/11/12 16:32, Yang, Wei wrote:
>>> Hi Andy, Lukasz,
>>>
>>> do you have an idea where is the xrootd-server-20121029.91e64a9-1.slc5
>>> coming from? Though I don't expect problems.
>>
>> >>>
>> https://teamcity-dss.cern.ch:8443/viewLog.html?buildId=21806&buildTypeId=bt45&tab=artifacts
>>
>>
>>
>> Or (or possibly something linked to from that).
>>
>> This is a version that doesn't segfault on intensive access.
>>>
>>> Chris, Wahid,
>>>
>>> I think next time we see this, can you use gcore to generate a core
>>> dump of xrootd and cmsd and ship to us? Sorry Wahid I forgot to
>>> request a core dump before asking for restart.
>>>
>>
>> gzipped core files:
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
