 |
 |
Fabrice Regarding #7, for sample queries related to PT1.1, I'd suggest to use: https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/db/Qserv/250NodeTestPlan However, PT1.1 is not good enough for testing this: https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/db/Qserv/PerTableKeyCache because this test exposes the fact that we have one huge table (RunDeepForcedSource), and some small tables, such as the Science_Ccd_Exposure, or RefObject. It'd make more sense to use the Winter13 data set for this test. That data set is on the large side... a little over 2 TB. I believe we will be moving more towards relying on that data set in the future, so it makes sense to get it. We are in the process of partitioning it right now on slac machines. We are happy to make it available to you, if you have space to take it, either as csv files, or partitioned data. Jacek On 02/06/2013 10:08 AM, Fabrice Jammes wrote: > Hello Daniel, Douglas and Jacek, > > Some typos and formatting problems were presents in the previous questions > list. The good one is attached to this mail. Thanks to use this one. > > Emmanuel and Fabrice > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1