Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for putting this together in an easy-to-ready format!
I am not sure if anyone from CMS got back to you on the "?" parameters, so I forwarded the slides to one of the JetMET experts for comment.
The only other number I had a question on was the track isolation, which is 0.5 for both CMS and ATLAS, but you propose 0.4. I think either value is fine, but just curious what the reason is to pick a value different from both.
Cheers,
Jim
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ashutosh Kotwal
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:26 PM
To: Peskin, Michael E.
Cc: snowmass-ef
Subject: Re: [SNOWMASS-EF] Phone meeting of Energy Frontier conveners
Colleagues,
Before the phone meeting I would like to see if we can settle on the idea of using a "snow mass" detector for the DELPHES fast simulation, derived from a judicious "average" of the ATLAS and CMS detector cards.
In the attached slides are shown the ATLAS and CMS detector parameter values from the card files posted on the snow mass web page (link is in the slides)
As you will see, the differences are second-order effects, and we will eliminate a lot of worthless hassle by using a single "typical LHC Snowmass detector". The slides show a "Snowmass" proposal, TBD
regards,
Ashutosh
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:57 PM, "Peskin, Michael E." <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We need to meet on the phone before the Brookhaven meeting, to discuss
> where we are in various activities (benchmarks, simulation, etc.) that should
> be ready by Brookhaven, and to address any questions that should be
> answered before the meeting.
>
> Chip and I would like to set up a meeting time next week (week of March 18);
> I put some extra possibilities on March 25, 26. Next week is an ATLAS
> Physics and Performance week, but I hope that those of you who are
> in Geneva can consider times when you can call in.
>
> Here is a Doodle poll to find a time for the meeting
>
> http://doodle.com/3hadsi99u2yhrmxh
>
> There is one potential source of confusion. Doodle only gives me choices of
> Standard Time in different time zones, but Sunday the US switched to Daylight
> Savings Time. So please interpret that meeting times as Daylight Savings Time
> (e.g. EDT or PDT).
>
> We will use ReadyTalk (phone) until someone has another easy to use preference.
> I will send the meeting coordinates when the time is set.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Michael
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael E. Peskin [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> HEP Theory Group, MS 81 -------
> SLAC National Accelerator Lab. phone: 1-(650)-926-3250
> 2575 Sand Hill Road fax: 1-(650)-926-2525
> Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA www.slac.stanford.edu/~mpeskin/<http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mpeskin/>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
