 |
 |
I would say that ticket 2796 should get merged into the master, and we should move forward to testing other merged branches and creating a new tag for qserv. Douglas On 04/29/2013 08:14 AM, Fabrice Jammes wrote: > Hello Daniel, Douglas and Jacek, > > As proposed during our last meeting > (https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/db/Qserv/IN2P3/Minutes25Apr2013) > > Could you please : > > - review ticket #2796 (Douglas) > - review ticket #2767 (Daniel) > > This two tickets are quite small, ready to merge (and waiting for a > review since already a few weeks). > It would be good we can merge them to master soon, in order not to do > twice the merge and test tasks. > > Furthermore, could you give us the contact who integrate Qserv with > Buildbot in order we provide some support on the install procedure and > on the test procedure (#2014) ? > > For information, Emmanuel and I have solved the problems that we > reported to you on Friday about tickets > https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/ticket/2834 (test on reduced PT1.2)and > https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/ticket/2837 (start of qms). I think we > will ask you soon to review them. > > Thanks in advance for your answers, > > The LPC team. > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1