Print

Print


Hi,

I believe Sven is right.    As you say, it is hard to see how to improve alpha_S
without a dedicated facility/program and no such thing is planned as far as 
I know.

This is an important - even key - question so it deserves study.  Perhaps
Sven's talk provides the right starting point.

Michael

On Apr 18, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Sven Heinemeyer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> 
>> The question for you is, how much would the extra factor of 10 at the Z pole (or the
>> extra factor of 100 beyond Giga-Z) buy you in terms of the physics?  My quick impression
>> is that it is not easy to convert the extra luminosity into physics.  GF and MZ must be
>> improved, and NNLO electroweak becomes relevant.   The uncertainty in alpha(mZ) also
>> needs improvement, and I do not see a way to do that.
>> 
> When we make GigaZ predictions for sin2eff, MW etc. we already use
> a very optimistic assumption on delta(Delta alpha_had) = 5 x 10^-5,
> resulting in an uncertainty of 1.8 x 10^-5 in sin2eff, i.e. even
> larger than the anticipated GigaZ uncertainty, see p. 7 of my talk
> at the BNL meeting a few weeks back:
> http://www.ifca.unican.es/users/heinemey/uni/talks/2013/SnowmassBNLEWPO.pdf
> 
> On the next page I give an estimate of intrinsic uncertainties, i.e. due
> to missing higher-order corrections. Also here in the future the
> GigaZ result can be matched only "so-so", and even less so in the MSSM,
> which is the *only* model so far in which these quantities have been evaluated to a precision roughly as in the SM, it is much worse in any other model.
> 
> Of course in the future many things are possible. But our expectations
> now (which are not wild guesses ;-) would not profit from another
> factor of 10 improvement.
> 
> Cheers,
>    Sven
> 
> 
> *******************************************************************************
> Sven Heinemeyer (IFCA (CSIC-UC), Santander, Spain)   > The future is not set!
> phone: ++34/942/20-1536, fax: -0935                  > There is NO FATE but
> email: Sven.Heinemeyer(at)cern.ch                    > what we make for
> WWW  : sven-heinemeyer.de                            > ourselves!
> skype: sven.heinemeyer                               >       (Kyle Reese, T2)

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK&A=1