Hi Lukasz,

I agree but my point is merely not putting the CGI information in the
target filename still produces an unexpected result. My suggestion was
that when it gets fixed it should be fixed the right way not just patched
up. All we are doing is postponing yet another fix when new complaints
start pouring in.

Andy

On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Lukasz Janyst wrote:

> The problem is that the new-old xrdcp is adding the CGI to the local target file name when the target specified on the command line is a local directory. It should not be doing this. It's likely a simple concatenation/trimming bug.
>
> The feature you're mentioning is another issue entirely and the new client does in fact support it in the exact way you describe it should be. You're right that the old code misses this feature, but I think we should not bother with it now.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/21#issuecomment-18788206
>


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.



Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1