 |
 |
Hi Andy, Excellent, thanks ... we'll be happy to test it! Horses are back in the stable :) Cheers, Matevz On 6/27/13 3:10 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: > Hi Matevz, > > Hold your horses. I have just ported XrdPosix to use the new client (I havn't > pushed the changes back into the branch). I would be very happy if you test > that. I won't be ready to push it until next week (in London now). The change > was not trivial and I took the opportunity to clean up some posix messes. > > Andy > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Matevz Tadel wrote: > >> Hi everybody ... but in particular Andy and Lukasz :) >> >> We are thinking of switching to using the new client for our caching-proxy at >> UCSD. Are we walking into a snake it or we can, more or less +/- a bus, just >> replace the client instantiation in XrdPosixXrootd: >> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/blob/master/src/XrdPosix/XrdPosixXrootd.cc#L418 >> >> There are some configuration parameters that are sent over to the old client >> via internal xrootd environment .. this is what worries me most. >> >> Best, >> Matevz >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 >> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1