 |
 |
Hello all, I'd like to echo Markus and Yuri's comments. I think the support for an eventual 100 TeV pp collider is very strong, certainly not less strong than a Higgs factory. Cheers, Jianming On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Yuri Gershtein < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:07 PM, "Markus A. Luty" <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > I believe it is imperative that the high-level Snowmass summary include > a statement that VLHC also represents an exciting possibility for the next > step forward. > > > I strongly agree. > Even given different timescales for VLHC and ILC, the way Markus phrased > it is right on. > > -y > > > ------------------------------ > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1