Dear Chip,
> This would make two points. First, I continue to feel
tension between the natural conservatism built into projecting
> with a running, battle-scarred real detector at LHC as
> compared with a highly tuned, but still proposed detector
at ILC.
> I also clearly am sensitive to the tension between the very
sophisticated ILC proposals and
> the really virtual TLEP ideas.
>What do you think?
I think this is reasonable.
Please note that the ILC projections that are based on full
simulation with backgrounds using
current event reconstruction are naturally conservative too. The
main reason is that the event reconstruction
while quite sophisticated is still at an early stage compared to
a running experiment, and this also applies to
the physics analyses based on full reconstruction.
best
Chip and Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond Brock *
University
Distinguished Professor
Department
of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan
State University
Biomedical
Physical Sciences
567
WIlson Road, Room 3210
East Lansing, MI 48824
cell:
(517)927-5447
MSU
office:
(517)353-1693/884-5579
open
fax: (517)355-6661
secure
fax: (517)351-0688
Fermilab
office: (630)840-2286
CERN
Office: 32 2-B03 *
76-71756
[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click
the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
--
Graham W. Wilson
Associate Professor
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
University of Kansas
Lawrence, KS 66045
Office Tel. 785-864-5231
Web: http://heplx3.phsx.ku.edu/~graham/
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1