Hi everyone-

I agree with Sally.  Also, I feel that a positive statement about an eventual VLHC is not necessarily a negative statement about the ILC.

Cheers,

Tom

On 8/23/2013 9:09 AM, Sally Dawson wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
I like Ashutosh's wording.  I think we need to say something positive about the VLHC.

Sally


On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Ashutosh Kotwal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
how about a more positive note, for example:
----

> A complementary option with great promise is a 100 TeV hadron collider,
> which has unprecedented potential reach for new physics associated with
> electroweak symmetry breaking, naturalness, and dark matter.
   Further investigations of the physics and technical issues would be opportune at this time, leading to conceptual and technical design reports.

-----

regards,
Ashutosh

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1




Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1