 |
 |
Hi Ashutosh- When forwarding, we should probably mention that a Snowmass-detector study done by an ATLAS author is not an ATLAS result, but that any result that uses ATLAS software or ATLAS datasets (even Monte Carlo) is. Otherwise I fear that this will be more confusing than clarifying. Cheers, Tom On 8/26/2013 8:07 AM, Ashutosh Kotwal wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > Please note the ATLAS request to follow the ATLAS publication policy > in our reports and White Papers. > > I would recommend that you forward this email to WhitePaper authors > in your subgroups so that they are also informed about the ATLAS > requirements. > > thanks, > Ashutosh > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *Michel Vetterli <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >> *Subject: **ATLAS contributions to Snowmass* >> *Date: *August 23, 2013 4:38:53 AM EDT >> *To: *Ashutosh Kotwal <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >> >> Dear Ashutosh, >> >> I understand that proceedings for the Snowmass meetings >> are currently in preparation, and many ATLAS authors are involved in >> this. I am writing to you in your role as the ATLAS contact for Snowmass. >> >> As you know individual ATLAS authors are not allowed to publish >> preliminary ATLAS results, see section 5 of the publication policy: >> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasProtected/AtlasPolicyDocuments/Publications_Policy.pdf >> >> PubCom and ATLAS management have discussed the special circumstances >> regarding ATLAS contributions to Snowmass. >> Of course we understand that conveners of the individual Snowmass >> working groups will have to sign these proceedings. Thus we would >> suggest the following: >> 1. As much as possible published results should be used. Many of the >> future studies were published in the phase-2 LOI, and the relevant >> plots can be found here: >> https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/UPGRADE/CERN-LHCC-2012-022/ >> For published results there is no problem at all. >> 2. Indicate on the cover page that these are *proceedings* of >> Snowmass. As you can see in the publication policy we have different >> rules for "proceedings on behalf of ATLAS". Of course these >> proceedings are not on behalf of ATLAS but in any case it seems good >> to indicate clearly that these are proceedings to distinguish them >> from a review article. >> 3. If preliminary results have to be used say "with contributions >> from the ATLAS collaboration" at the end of the author list. (We are >> not sure about how CMS wants to handle this) >> >> Could you please make sure that these suggestions are implemented for >> all articles that contain preliminary ATLAS results? If this is >> controversial please feel free to get back to me so we can try to >> work out a different compromise that complies with the ATLAS rules. >> >> Mike Vetterli >> ATLAS Publications Committee Chair >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1