Thanks for sitting through that. It was helpful.

I'm sure you realize that given the week that this is a little difficult. What I showed was from this afternoon when I was literally still receiving material and we'd just pasted things in this afternoon. There was almost no time for organizing.

We're now in the process of reducing the "conclusions" to those of only a high- level. Instead of 5 slides, 1-2. Ideally we would have done this before 4pm, but it is what it is. Of course I knew that what I walked in with was untenable.

If you have particular suggestions, please send them to us.

You can see the keynotes and a pdf at http://www.pa.msu.edu/~brock/file_sharing/snowmass2013/

If you change any slides, please extract the slides you want me to see and send only those.

I will update in a few hours and post again.

Higgs folks. We have to do something about the tables, and you got a message from me on that. I intend to not show the lepton-collider-only table. Two of these is too much. The point is not that the model-independent fits change dramatically the picture that sub-percent precisions are doable at the ILC and/or friends. I'd rather do this in the single comparison with LHC. Okay?

Like I wrote earlier, charts with some representative precisions against which I can show theoretical anticipation would be very nice.

best

Chip and Michael. Still sitting in the lecture room.