Question: Did any of you hear any substantive suggestion that a VLHC should be the follow-on collider to LHC? I'm asking for a reason...the mention of ILC in this way is deemed as not representative of the whole community and as "there are also those who believe in that a 100 TeV proton machine should be next" (a quote from a prominent fellow).
I personally don't think that 100% unanimity is required in order to emphasize one future program over others. But I'd really not heard this particular sentiment in any substantive way.
best
Chip