Print

Print


On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:07 PM, "Markus A. Luty" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  I believe it is imperative that the high-level Snowmass summary include a statement that VLHC also represents an exciting possibility for the next step forward.

I strongly agree.
Even given different timescales for VLHC and ILC, the way Markus phrased it is right on.

-y


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1