I'd like to echo Markus and Yuri's comments. I think the support for an eventual 100 TeV pp collider is very strong, certainly not less strong than a Higgs factory.

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Yuri Gershtein <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:07 PM, "Markus A. Luty" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I believe it is imperative that the high-level Snowmass summary include a statement that VLHC also represents an exciting possibility for the next step forward.

I strongly agree.

Even given different timescales for VLHC and ILC, the way Markus phrased it is right on.

-y

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1